Good morning to the other 74,999,999 semi-fascists trying to destroy our democracy by insisting the FBI, the DOJ, the Intel community, the military, the IRS, and congressional Democrats apply laws equally — and that the Executive branch not use private Big Tech companies to censor speech at the Administration’s direction.
Apparently, you need be an *actual* fascist to battle the “MAGA extremists” that comprise half — or maybe more —of the voting population.
Remember the instructive, sober words of communication luminary, Karine Jean-Pierre: you’re considered an extremist if you disagree with the progressive political consensus. Opposition to the ruling party is an act of insurrection.
— Meanwhile, you are most certainly in the camp of non-extremists if you back President Turnip and his 38% approval rating, because in progressive math, 38% approval is approval enough. So shut up, you 62% of the population who are racist fascist transphobic xenophobes!
President Turnip has F-15s. Do you? President Turnip directs a military armed with non-gendered pronouns and led by a thick-bodied, bag-eyed yes man in touch with his privilege and aware of his own white rage. Do you? President Turnip has the unwavering support of Max Boot and Jen Rubin — two of this country’s most beautiful minds. Do you?
“Dark Brandon,” flanked by Marines and backed by Hellish lighting, mumbled, shouted, and emoted his way through a Hitleresque scapegoating of large swaths of the population. And his call to arms has energized all the woke and virtuous defenders of democracy, who are now demanding a one-party system and the shunning of Republicans as lesser humans. Because, in the same way you sometimes have to destroy villages to save them, sometimes you have to become an unelected Administrative dictatorship to save democracy from the benighted and filthy MAGAts who so frustratingly vote incorrectly.
President Turnip’s speech — presented with the full backing of the Executive branch and its law enforcement and justice arms — was perhaps the most egregious speech ever given by a US president. It was more than simply divisive. It was tacit permission to treat those who don’t favor progressive governance as enemies of the State. It’s the summer of 2020 with presidential approval. It’s dangerous. It’s unconscionable.
And we know this didn’t land with all the sanctimonious anti-MAGA crowd, because even slovenly token CNN Republican and Dispatch co-founder Jonah Goldberg — while agreeing with “nearly all”of what Biden said on the substance — still called the speech “a mistake.”
And though the author of Liberal Fascism has morphed into the kind of lazy compromised shill who now uses his own book as an instruction manual rather than the political jeremiad it once was, it remains true that when you’ve even semi-lost Goldberg, you risk losing those legions of putative Republicans heretofore willing to elect progressive Democrats in order to conserve conservatism.
— Because while nothing is more crucial to conserving conservatism than protecting those hallowed norms that translate into politicizing the DOJ, the FBI, the Intel community, the IRS, et al., while simultaneously using executive orders to destroy energy independence, import millions of unvetted illegals, and wage lawfare against your political opponents, confrontational speech may just be a bridge too far!
It’s time to revisit Ayers’ et al., Prairie Fire manifesto, which laid out a blueprint for the violent socialist takeover of the US. It involved imprisoning political dissidents. Re-education camps. And even worse, for the intransigent.
Since we know that Barack Obama was a protégé of Ayers, and since we know that the Biden Administration is really the third Obama administration with a corrupt, incontinent, and addled figurehead who can barely read a teleprompter, it’s worth passing around the word: Cloward-Piven will mark the end of the middle class and create new dependents. Political opposition to this Great Reset will be criminalized. And then?
Utopia!
That’s the plan.
It can happen here. Biden’s speech last night shows that the more desperate the socialist authoritarians become to finish their project, the more latitude they’re willing to give themselves to allow the ends to justify the means.
We are here. Time is running out. What are we prepared to do about it?
I say this with all due reverence to the past-
OUTLAW.
"Remember the instructive, sober words of communication luminary, Karine Jean-Pierre: you’re considered an extremist if you disagree with the progressive political consensus. Opposition to the ruling party is an act of insurrection."
I am old enough to remember when Dissent was Patriotic." Yeah, I know, "No one could be THAT old"! from the Less-Experienced. Behave, or I shall smite thee with my cane.