Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rita Rippetoe's avatar

On "follow the science" I will say that those incapable of simple logic are mentally incapable of following science. When the long-promised vaccines arrived, someone assured me in conversation that there were no long-term side effects. It is obviously impossible for any evidence of long-term effects to exist when there has been no long-term experience. But to state this simple fact meant being accused of vaccine denial and other thought crimes. Later, after experience had demonstrated that the vaccines did not prevent infection or transmission, I suggested to a friend that this eliminated any rationale for forcing vaccination. Not so, he argued, the vaccinated are less likely to become seriously ill or to die. Even if one grants this preposition, it still does not provide a reason to require vaccination in order to enter venues, attend classes, etc. since the legal rationale for forced vaccination is society's interest in protecting others.

Rita

Expand full comment
beth elliott's avatar

Wake me when Dylan Mulvaney undergoes genital feminization surgery, not just facial feminization surgery. I bet it won't happen—queens gonna queen. I've not added "autogynephilia" to my vocabulary, because, when it first got batted about, I thought Blanchard and Lawrence were both using it to overgeneralize. Now, though, I do believe there is an "AGP" population that will do anything to mimic femaleness/femininity while take great care to preserve their "Barbie wands." I don't see any other explanation. I still don't confuse them with actual sufferers of acute gender dysphoria, because that's different from "gender incongruence" and, G-d forbid, "gender creativity."

I think you're correct about 2023 being a pivotal year, as evidenced by Sweden bucking the transestablishment and propounding actual psychological vetting and other more skeptical standards for youth "gender care." Methinks sharks are being jumped.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts